Monto vs Mulgildie

Monto scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mulgildie (969) sits above Monto (965).

Buying in Monto or Mulgildie?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Monto? The free selling guide

Monto and Mulgildie side by side

MeasureMontoMulgildie
Renting
Owner occupied64.0%63.0%
Renter occupied31.0%17.0%
Schools
Schools nearby35
Average ICSEA965969
Lifestyle and people
Walk score1000
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population1,156147
Median age5546
Climate
Annual rainfall671 mm635 mm
Mean max, January32.5°C32.6°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mulgildie edges out on average school ICSEA (969 vs 965).

Monto vs Mulgildie: common questions

Does Monto or Mulgildie have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mulgildie scores 969 vs 965 in Monto. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Monto or Mulgildie?

Monto scores 100/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.