Monto vs Mungungo

Monto scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Mungungo skews owner-occupied (79%), Monto runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

Buying in Monto or Mungungo?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Monto? The free selling guide

Monto and Mungungo side by side

MeasureMontoMungungo
Renting
Owner occupied64.0%79.0%
Renter occupied31.0%10.0%
Schools
Schools nearby33
Average ICSEA965965
Lifestyle and people
Walk score1000
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population1,15684
Median age5546
Climate
Annual rainfall671 mm670 mm
Mean max, January32.5°C32.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Monto vs Mungungo: common questions

Which is more walkable, Monto or Mungungo?

Monto scores 100/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.