Side by sideSuburb comparison

Moonta Mines vs Hamley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Moonta Mines edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Moonta Mines scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Hamley skews owner-occupied (129%), Moonta Mines runs more rental-dense (84% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsMoonta Mines vs Hamley

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Moonta Mines or Hamley?

Moonta Mines scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Moonta Mines
Metric
Hamley

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$165/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$213/wk
84.0%
Owner occupied
129.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
20
Bike score
20
177
Population
31
55
Median age
61

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
6
932
Avg ICSEA
932

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).