Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Direction vs Lower Turners Marsh.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Direction edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Direction (957) sits above Lower Turners Marsh (945). Mount Direction skews owner-occupied (88%), Lower Turners Marsh runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Direction edges out on average school ICSEA (957 vs 945).

Common questionsMount Direction vs Lower Turners Marsh

Common questions

Does Mount Direction or Lower Turners Marsh have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Direction scores 957 vs 945 in Lower Turners Marsh. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Direction
Metric
Lower Turners Marsh

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$290/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$233/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$115/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
57.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
248
Population
28
46
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
7
957
Avg ICSEA
945

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).