Mount Fox vs Lannercost

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Fox (908) sits above Lannercost (899). Mount Fox skews owner-occupied (95%), Lannercost runs more rental-dense (71% owner).

Buying in Mount Fox or Lannercost?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mount Fox? The free selling guide

Mount Fox and Lannercost side by side

MeasureMount FoxLannercost
Renting
Owner occupied95.0%71.0%
Renter occupied–10.0%
Schools
Schools nearby119
Average ICSEA908899
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population84168
Median age5145
Climate
Annual rainfall1335 mm2238 mm
Mean max, January30.3°C32.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mount Fox edges out on average school ICSEA (908 vs 899). Lannercost also has a higher family-household share (76% vs 61%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Mount Fox vs Lannercost: common questions

Does Mount Fox or Lannercost have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Fox scores 908 vs 899 in Lannercost. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.