Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Macarthur vs Belcong.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Belcong edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Belcong (937) sits above Mount Macarthur (924). Mount Macarthur skews owner-occupied (100%), Belcong runs more rental-dense (54% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Belcong edges out on average school ICSEA (937 vs 924). Mount Macarthur also has a higher family-household share (75% vs 62%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMount Macarthur vs Belcong

Common questions

Does Mount Macarthur or Belcong have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Belcong scores 937 vs 924 in Mount Macarthur. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Macarthur
Metric
Belcong

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$210/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$210/wk
$179/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$179/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
54.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
31
Population
38
31
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
3
924
Avg ICSEA
937

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).