Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Macarthur vs Norwich Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Macarthur edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Macarthur (924) sits above Norwich Park (904).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Macarthur edges out on average school ICSEA (924 vs 904).

Common questionsMount Macarthur vs Norwich Park

Common questions

Does Mount Macarthur or Norwich Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Macarthur scores 924 vs 904 in Norwich Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Macarthur
Metric
Norwich Park

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$210/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$100/wk
$179/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$85/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
31
Population
31
Median age

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
2
924
Avg ICSEA
904

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).