Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Sturt vs Yangan.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Yangan edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Yangan scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Yangan skews owner-occupied (83%), Mount Sturt runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Yangan has a heavier family-household mix (77% vs 50%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsMount Sturt vs Yangan

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Mount Sturt or Yangan?

Yangan scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Sturt
Metric
Yangan

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$235/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$213/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
2
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
14
Population
404
51
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
15
953
Avg ICSEA
953

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).