Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Sturt vs Upper Freestone.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Upper Freestone edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Upper Freestone (954) sits above Mount Sturt (953). Upper Freestone skews owner-occupied (79%), Mount Sturt runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Upper Freestone edges out on average school ICSEA (954 vs 953). Upper Freestone also has a higher family-household share (121% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMount Sturt vs Upper Freestone

Common questions

Does Mount Sturt or Upper Freestone have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Upper Freestone scores 954 vs 953 in Mount Sturt. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Sturt
Metric
Upper Freestone

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$208/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
Renter occupied
25.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
14
Population
75
51
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
13
953
Avg ICSEA
954

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).