Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Sturt vs Freestone.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Freestone skews owner-occupied (76%), Mount Sturt runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Freestone has a heavier family-household mix (76% vs 50%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Mount Sturt
Metric
Freestone

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$260/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
Renter occupied
5.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
14
Population
208
51
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
15
953
Avg ICSEA
953

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).