Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mount Sturt vs Emu Vale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Emu Vale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Emu Vale (973) sits above Mount Sturt (953). Emu Vale skews owner-occupied (93%), Mount Sturt runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Emu Vale edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 953). Emu Vale also has a higher family-household share (70% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMount Sturt vs Emu Vale

Common questions

Does Mount Sturt or Emu Vale have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Emu Vale scores 973 vs 953 in Mount Sturt. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mount Sturt
Metric
Emu Vale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$235/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
93.0%
Renter occupied
4.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
14
Population
161
51
Median age
60

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
7
953
Avg ICSEA
973

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).