Nanima vs Apsley

Nanima scores higher on walkability (98/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

Buying in Nanima or Apsley?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Nanima? The free selling guide

Nanima and Apsley side by side

MeasureNanimaApsley
Renting
House rent$450/wk$450/wk
Owner occupied83.0%90.0%
Renter occupied9.0%15.0%
Schools
Schools nearby44
Average ICSEA856856
Lifestyle and people
Walk score980
Transit score100
Bike score500
Population252116
Median age4347
Climate
Annual rainfall620 mm619 mm
Mean max, January33.2°C33.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Nanima vs Apsley: common questions

Which is more walkable, Nanima or Apsley?

Nanima scores 98/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.