Side by sideSuburb comparison

Narrogin vs Cuballing.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Narrogin edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Narrogin scores higher on walkability (52/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Cuballing skews owner-occupied (86%), Narrogin runs more rental-dense (62% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cuballing has a heavier family-household mix (73% vs 60%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsNarrogin vs Cuballing

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Narrogin or Cuballing?

Narrogin scores 52/100 on walkability vs 6/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Narrogin
Metric
Cuballing

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$216/wk
$240/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$280/wk
62.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
33.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

52
Walk score
6
0
Transit score
0
25
Bike score
0
3,927
Population
456
43
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
5
946
Avg ICSEA
946

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).