Nurran vs W Tree

W Tree scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving W Tree (1017) sits above Nurran (964). Nurran skews owner-occupied (100%), W Tree runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

Buying in Nurran or W Tree?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Nurran? The free selling guide

Nurran and W Tree side by side

MeasureNurranW Tree
Renting
Owner occupied100.0%80.0%
Schools
Schools nearby31
Average ICSEA9641017
Lifestyle and people
Walk score02
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population747
Median age6163
Climate
Annual rainfall902 mm819 mm
Mean max, January25.6°C24.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
W Tree edges out on average school ICSEA (1017 vs 964).

Nurran vs W Tree: common questions

Does Nurran or W Tree have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), W Tree scores 1017 vs 964 in Nurran. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Nurran or W Tree?

W Tree scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.