Pine Valley vs Polo Flat

Polo Flat scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 4/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

Buying in Pine Valley or Polo Flat?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Pine Valley? The free selling guide

Pine Valley and Polo Flat side by side

MeasurePine ValleyPolo Flat
Renting
House rent$550/wk$550/wk
Unit rent$400/wk$400/wk
Owner occupied100.0%–
Renter occupied–50.0%
Schools
Schools nearby66
Average ICSEA996996
Lifestyle and people
Walk score04
Transit score00
Bike score015
Population3013
Median age4743
Climate
Annual rainfall543 mm517 mm
Mean max, January26.7°C27.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Pine Valley has a heavier family-household mix (113% vs 83%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Pine Valley vs Polo Flat: common questions

Which is more walkable, Pine Valley or Polo Flat?

Polo Flat scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.