Cooma vs Pine Valley

Cooma scores higher on walkability (92/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Pine Valley skews owner-occupied (100%), Cooma runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

Buying in Cooma or Pine Valley?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Cooma? The free selling guide

Cooma and Pine Valley side by side

MeasureCoomaPine Valley
Price and market
Median house$560,000–
Median unit$632,500–
House price change, 12 months+4.7%–
Renting
House rent$550/wk$550/wk
Unit rent$400/wk$400/wk
Owner occupied67.0%100.0%
Renter occupied29.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby66
Average ICSEA996996
Lifestyle and people
Walk score920
Transit score00
Bike score850
Population6,71530
Median age4447
Climate
Annual rainfall517 mm543 mm
Mean max, January27.1°C26.7°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Pine Valley has a heavier family-household mix (113% vs 62%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Cooma vs Pine Valley: common questions

Which is more walkable, Cooma or Pine Valley?

Cooma scores 92/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.