Side by sideSuburb comparison

Pingaring vs Lake Biddy.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Pingaring edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pingaring (1012) sits above Lake Biddy (967). Lake Biddy skews owner-occupied (87%), Pingaring runs more rental-dense (45% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Pingaring edges out on average school ICSEA (1012 vs 967). Pingaring also has a higher family-household share (75% vs 43%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsPingaring vs Lake Biddy

Common questions

Does Pingaring or Lake Biddy have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pingaring scores 1012 vs 967 in Lake Biddy. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Pingaring
Metric
Lake Biddy

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$163/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$163/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
45.0%
Owner occupied
87.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
60
Population
59
46
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
1012
Avg ICSEA
967

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).