Port Sorell vs Squeaking Point

Port Sorell scores higher on walkability (6/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Squeaking Point skews owner-occupied (94%), Port Sorell runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

Buying in Port Sorell or Squeaking Point?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Port Sorell? The free selling guide

Port Sorell and Squeaking Point side by side

MeasurePort SorellSqueaking Point
Price and market
Median house$718,500–
Median unit$465,000–
Renting
House rent$260/wk$260/wk
Unit rent$275/wk$330/wk
Owner occupied78.0%94.0%
Renter occupied20.0%6.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA948948
Lifestyle and people
Walk score60
Transit score00
Bike score155
Population2,221337
Median age5245
Climate
Annual rainfall711 mm755 mm
Mean max, January21.6°C21.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Port Sorell vs Squeaking Point: common questions

Which is more walkable, Port Sorell or Squeaking Point?

Port Sorell scores 6/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.