Shearwater vs Squeaking Point

Shearwater scores higher on walkability (20/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Squeaking Point skews owner-occupied (94%), Shearwater runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

Buying in Shearwater or Squeaking Point?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Shearwater? The free selling guide

Shearwater and Squeaking Point side by side

MeasureShearwaterSqueaking Point
Renting
House rent$260/wk$260/wk
Unit rent$295/wk$330/wk
Owner occupied76.0%94.0%
Renter occupied21.0%6.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA948948
Lifestyle and people
Walk score200
Transit score00
Bike score05
Population2,051337
Median age5845
Climate
Annual rainfall711 mm755 mm
Mean max, January21.6°C21.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Squeaking Point has a heavier family-household mix (79% vs 66%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Shearwater vs Squeaking Point: common questions

Which is more walkable, Shearwater or Squeaking Point?

Shearwater scores 20/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.