Rockingham vs Lower Tully
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Rockingham (935) sits above Lower Tully (924).
Buying in Rockingham or Lower Tully?
The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guideSelling in Rockingham? The free selling guide
Rockingham and Lower Tully side by side
| Measure | Rockingham | Lower Tully |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | – | 42.0% |
| Renter occupied | – | 10.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 4 | 2 |
| Average ICSEA | 935 | 924 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | – | 88 |
| Median age | – | 54 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 2993 mm | 2907 mm |
| Mean max, January | 31.5°C | 31.4°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Rockingham edges out on average school ICSEA (935 vs 924).
Rockingham vs Lower Tully: common questions
Does Rockingham or Lower Tully have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Rockingham scores 935 vs 924 in Lower Tully. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Rockingham with
Choosing between Rockingham and Lower Tully?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.