Side by sideSuburb comparison

Rosebery vs Daceyville.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Daceyville edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Daceyville (1089) sits above Rosebery (1060). Rosebery skews owner-occupied (47%), Daceyville runs more rental-dense (18% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Daceyville edges out on average school ICSEA (1089 vs 1060). Rosebery also has a higher family-household share (64% vs 41%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsRosebery vs Daceyville

Common questions

Does Rosebery or Daceyville have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Daceyville scores 1089 vs 1060 in Rosebery. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Rosebery
Metric
Daceyville

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$520/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$450/wk
$580/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$130/wk
47.0%
Owner occupied
18.0%
51.0%
Renter occupied
76.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
0
Transit score
100
Bike score
13,533
Population
1,146
33
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1060
Avg ICSEA
1089

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).