Side by sideSuburb comparison

Rowsley vs Maddingley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Maddingley edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Maddingley (1015) sits above Rowsley (1007). Rowsley skews owner-occupied (97%), Maddingley runs more rental-dense (73% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Maddingley edges out on average school ICSEA (1015 vs 1007). Rowsley also has a higher family-household share (89% vs 77%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsRowsley vs Maddingley

Common questions

Does Rowsley or Maddingley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Maddingley scores 1015 vs 1007 in Rowsley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Rowsley
Metric
Maddingley

Price & Market

Median house
$650,000
Median unit
$274,320
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$340/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$340/wk
$375/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$366/wk
97.0%
Owner occupied
73.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
100
231
Population
5,491
41
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
8
1007
Avg ICSEA
1015

Climate

612 mm
Annual rainfall
612 mm
25.3°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.3°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).