Running Creek vs Mount Gipps
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Gipps (990) sits above Running Creek (982).
Buying in Running Creek or Mount Gipps?
The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guideSelling in Running Creek? The free selling guide
Running Creek and Mount Gipps side by side
| Measure | Running Creek | Mount Gipps |
|---|---|---|
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 20 | 20 |
| Average ICSEA | 982 | 990 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | – | 12 |
| Median age | – | 56 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 902 mm | 961 mm |
| Mean max, January | 29.5°C | 28.5°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Mount Gipps edges out on average school ICSEA (990 vs 982).
Running Creek vs Mount Gipps: common questions
Does Running Creek or Mount Gipps have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Gipps scores 990 vs 982 in Running Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Running Creek with
Choosing between Running Creek and Mount Gipps?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.