Squeaking Point vs Port Sorell

Port Sorell scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Squeaking Point skews owner-occupied (94%), Port Sorell runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

Buying in Squeaking Point or Port Sorell?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Squeaking Point? The free selling guide

Squeaking Point and Port Sorell side by side

MeasureSqueaking PointPort Sorell
Price and market
Median house–$718,500
Median unit–$465,000
Renting
House rent$260/wk$260/wk
Unit rent$330/wk$275/wk
Owner occupied94.0%78.0%
Renter occupied6.0%20.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA948948
Lifestyle and people
Walk score06
Transit score00
Bike score515
Population3372,221
Median age4552
Climate
Annual rainfall755 mm711 mm
Mean max, January21.8°C21.6°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Squeaking Point vs Port Sorell: common questions

Which is more walkable, Squeaking Point or Port Sorell?

Port Sorell scores 6/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.