Side by sideSuburb comparison

Stone Hut vs Beetaloo Valley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Stone Hut edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Stone Hut (981) sits above Beetaloo Valley (946). Beetaloo Valley skews owner-occupied (87%), Stone Hut runs more rental-dense (72% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Stone Hut edges out on average school ICSEA (981 vs 946). Beetaloo Valley also has a higher family-household share (81% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsStone Hut vs Beetaloo Valley

Common questions

Does Stone Hut or Beetaloo Valley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Stone Hut scores 981 vs 946 in Beetaloo Valley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Stone Hut
Metric
Beetaloo Valley

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$189/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
72.0%
Owner occupied
87.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
10
Bike score
0
30
Population
75
69
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
12
981
Avg ICSEA
946

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).