Stonehaven vs Batesford

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Stonehaven (1051) sits above Batesford (1013).

Buying in Stonehaven or Batesford?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Stonehaven? The free selling guide

Stonehaven and Batesford side by side

MeasureStonehavenBatesford
Renting
Owner occupied91.0%94.0%
Renter occupied22.0%3.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA10511013
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score05
Population791,141
Median age4439
Climate
Annual rainfall518 mm494 mm
Mean max, January25.4°C25.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Stonehaven edges out on average school ICSEA (1051 vs 1013). Batesford also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 78%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Stonehaven vs Batesford: common questions

Does Stonehaven or Batesford have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Stonehaven scores 1051 vs 1013 in Batesford. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.