Tothill Belt vs Apoinga
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Apoinga (980) sits above Tothill Belt (976). Apoinga skews owner-occupied (100%), Tothill Belt runs more rental-dense (43% owner).
Buying in Tothill Belt or Apoinga?
Selling in Tothill Belt? The free selling guide
Tothill Belt and Apoinga side by side
| Measure | Tothill Belt | Apoinga |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 43.0% | 100.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 16 | 13 |
| Average ICSEA | 976 | 980 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 18 | 29 |
| Median age | 49 | 39 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 476 mm | 462 mm |
| Mean max, January | 29.6°C | 29.7°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Apoinga edges out on average school ICSEA (980 vs 976). Tothill Belt also has a higher family-household share (86% vs 43%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Tothill Belt vs Apoinga: common questions
Does Tothill Belt or Apoinga have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Apoinga scores 980 vs 976 in Tothill Belt. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Tothill Belt with
Choosing between Tothill Belt and Apoinga?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.