Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tully vs Birkalla.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Birkalla edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Birkalla (932) sits above Tully (930). Birkalla skews owner-occupied (72%), Tully runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Birkalla edges out on average school ICSEA (932 vs 930). Birkalla also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 62%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsTully vs Birkalla

Common questions

Does Tully or Birkalla have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Birkalla scores 932 vs 930 in Tully. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tully
Metric
Birkalla

Price & Market

$450,000
Median house
$245,000
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$215/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$263/wk
55.0%
Owner occupied
72.0%
39.0%
Renter occupied
35.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
2,368
Population
156
38
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
4
930
Avg ICSEA
932

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).