Side by sideSuburb comparison

Turrella vs Undercliffe.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Undercliffe edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Undercliffe (1066) sits above Turrella (1063). Undercliffe skews owner-occupied (109%), Turrella runs more rental-dense (53% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Undercliffe edges out on average school ICSEA (1066 vs 1063).

Common questionsTurrella vs Undercliffe

Common questions

Does Turrella or Undercliffe have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Undercliffe scores 1066 vs 1063 in Turrella. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Turrella
Metric
Undercliffe

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$520/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$550/wk
$520/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$280/wk
53.0%
Owner occupied
109.0%
43.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
20
Transit score
100
Bike score
2,673
Population
27
32
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1063
Avg ICSEA
1066

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).