Undercliffe vs Amosfield
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Undercliffe (953) sits above Amosfield (947). Undercliffe skews owner-occupied (109%), Amosfield runs more rental-dense (59% owner).
Buying in Undercliffe or Amosfield?
Selling in Undercliffe? The free selling guide
Undercliffe and Amosfield side by side
| Measure | Undercliffe | Amosfield |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 109.0% | 59.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 18 | 8 |
| Average ICSEA | 953 | 947 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 27 | 40 |
| Median age | 59 | 63 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 806 mm | 869 mm |
| Mean max, January | 28.5°C | 26.7°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Undercliffe edges out on average school ICSEA (953 vs 947). Undercliffe also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 29%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Undercliffe vs Amosfield: common questions
Does Undercliffe or Amosfield have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Undercliffe scores 953 vs 947 in Amosfield. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Undercliffe with
Choosing between Undercliffe and Amosfield?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.