Side by sideSuburb comparison

Upper Lansdowne vs Yarratt Forest.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Upper Lansdowne edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Upper Lansdowne (927) sits above Yarratt Forest (921).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Upper Lansdowne edges out on average school ICSEA (927 vs 921).

Common questionsUpper Lansdowne vs Yarratt Forest

Common questions

Does Upper Lansdowne or Yarratt Forest have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Upper Lansdowne scores 927 vs 921 in Yarratt Forest. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Upper Lansdowne
Metric
Yarratt Forest

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$305/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$255/wk
86.0%
Owner occupied
8.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
533
Population
9,650
54
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
20
927
Avg ICSEA
921

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).