Side by sideSuburb comparison

Walmsley vs Seppings.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Seppings edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Seppings (994) sits above Walmsley (992).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Seppings edges out on average school ICSEA (994 vs 992). Walmsley also has a higher family-household share (87% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWalmsley vs Seppings

Common questions

Does Walmsley or Seppings have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Seppings scores 994 vs 992 in Walmsley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Walmsley
Metric
Seppings

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$320/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
78.0%
20.0%
Renter occupied
25.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
2
Transit score
0
Bike score
30
47
Population
177
44
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
16
992
Avg ICSEA
994

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).