Ward vs Caroline Crossing

Caroline Crossing scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 24/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Ward skews owner-occupied (88%), Caroline Crossing runs more rental-dense (18% owner).

Buying in Ward or Caroline Crossing?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Ward? The free selling guide

Ward and Caroline Crossing side by side

MeasureWardCaroline Crossing
Renting
Owner occupied88.0%18.0%
Schools
Schools nearby01
Average ICSEA–912
Lifestyle and people
Walk score024
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population8744
Median age3648
Climate
Annual rainfall473 mm502 mm
Mean max, January35.8°C35.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Ward has a heavier family-household mix (80% vs 65%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Ward vs Caroline Crossing: common questions

Which is more walkable, Ward or Caroline Crossing?

Caroline Crossing scores 24/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.