Side by sideSuburb comparison

Baree vs Johnsons Hill.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Johnsons Hill edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Johnsons Hill (876) sits above Baree (846). Baree skews owner-occupied (93%), Johnsons Hill runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Johnsons Hill edges out on average school ICSEA (876 vs 846).

Common questionsBaree vs Johnsons Hill

Common questions

Does Baree or Johnsons Hill have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Johnsons Hill scores 876 vs 846 in Baree. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Baree
Metric
Johnsons Hill

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$170/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
60.0%
4.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
10
Bike score
20
201
Population
7
57
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
3
846
Avg ICSEA
876

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).