Side by sideSuburb comparison

Baree vs Walterhall.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Baree skews owner-occupied (93%), Walterhall runs more rental-dense (79% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Baree has a heavier family-household mix (61% vs 47%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Baree
Metric
Walterhall

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
4.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
10
Bike score
15
201
Population
156
57
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
846
Avg ICSEA
846

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).