Batesford vs Gheringhap

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gheringhap (1038) sits above Batesford (1013).

Buying in Batesford or Gheringhap?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Batesford? The free selling guide

Batesford and Gheringhap side by side

MeasureBatesfordGheringhap
Renting
Owner occupied94.0%89.0%
Renter occupied3.0%13.0%
Schools
Schools nearby207
Average ICSEA10131038
Lifestyle and people
Walk score0–
Transit score0–
Bike score5–
Population1,141132
Median age3949
Climate
Annual rainfall494 mm509 mm
Mean max, January25.8°C26.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Gheringhap edges out on average school ICSEA (1038 vs 1013). Batesford also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Batesford vs Gheringhap: common questions

Does Batesford or Gheringhap have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gheringhap scores 1038 vs 1013 in Batesford. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.