Side by sideSuburb comparison

Busbys Flat vs Kippenduff.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Busbys Flat edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Busbys Flat (887) sits above Kippenduff (884). Busbys Flat skews owner-occupied (100%), Kippenduff runs more rental-dense (83% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Busbys Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (887 vs 884).

Common questionsBusbys Flat vs Kippenduff

Common questions

Does Busbys Flat or Kippenduff have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Busbys Flat scores 887 vs 884 in Kippenduff. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Busbys Flat
Metric
Kippenduff

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$130/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$204/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
57
Population
17
52
Median age
66

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

12
Schools nearby
9
887
Avg ICSEA
884

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).