Busbys Flat vs Kippenduff
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Busbys Flat (887) sits above Kippenduff (884). Busbys Flat skews owner-occupied (100%), Kippenduff runs more rental-dense (83% owner).
Buying in Busbys Flat or Kippenduff?
Selling in Busbys Flat? The free selling guide
Busbys Flat and Kippenduff side by side
| Measure | Busbys Flat | Kippenduff |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 100.0% | 83.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 12 | 9 |
| Average ICSEA | 887 | 884 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 57 | 17 |
| Median age | 52 | 66 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 1003 mm | 1004 mm |
| Mean max, January | 30.5°C | 30.4°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Busbys Flat edges out on average school ICSEA (887 vs 884).
Busbys Flat vs Kippenduff: common questions
Does Busbys Flat or Kippenduff have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Busbys Flat scores 887 vs 884 in Kippenduff. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Busbys Flat with
Choosing between Busbys Flat and Kippenduff?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.