Side by sideSuburb comparison

Carss Park vs Kyle Bay.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $2,525,000 and $3,000,000. Carss Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Carss Park (median $2,525,000) is roughly 16% cheaper to buy into than Kyle Bay ($3,000,000). Over the past year, Carss Park (+23.6%) ran 11.0 percentage points ahead of Kyle Bay (+12.6%) on house-price growth.

Carss Park scores higher on walkability (14/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Carss Park (1079) sits above Kyle Bay (1078). Kyle Bay skews owner-occupied (91%), Carss Park runs more rental-dense (79% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Carss Park is the lower entry point at $2,525,000 median, 16% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Carss Park carries both higher gross yield (2.01% vs 1.69%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Carss Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1079 vs 1078). Kyle Bay also has a higher family-household share (89% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCarss Park vs Kyle Bay

Common questions

Is Carss Park or Kyle Bay cheaper to buy in?

Carss Park has the lower median house price at $2,525,000, roughly 16% below Kyle Bay ($3,000,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Carss Park or Kyle Bay?

Over the past 12 months, Carss Park grew +23.6% vs +12.6% in Kyle Bay, a gap of 11.0 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Carss Park or Kyle Bay have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Carss Park scores 1079 vs 1078 in Kyle Bay. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Carss Park or Kyle Bay?

Carss Park scores 14/100 on walkability vs 8/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Carss Park or Kyle Bay?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.01% in Carss Park vs 1.69% in Kyle Bay. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Carss Park
Metric
Kyle Bay

Price & Market

$2,525,000
Median house
$3,000,000
$475,200
Median unit
$475,200
+23.6%
Annual growth (house)
+12.6%
Days on market

Rental

$975/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$975/wk
$760/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$760/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
18.0%
Renter occupied
5.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

14
Walk score
8
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
1,265
Population
1,039
46
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1079
Avg ICSEA
1078

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).