Side by sideSuburb comparison

Codrington vs Tatham.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Codrington edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Codrington (946) sits above Tatham (929). Codrington skews owner-occupied (114%), Tatham runs more rental-dense (92% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Codrington edges out on average school ICSEA (946 vs 929). Codrington also has a higher family-household share (129% vs 80%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCodrington vs Tatham

Common questions

Does Codrington or Tatham have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Codrington scores 946 vs 929 in Tatham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Codrington
Metric
Tatham

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$245/wk
114.0%
Owner occupied
92.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
4.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
83
Population
225
42
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
946
Avg ICSEA
929

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).