Crescent vs Mundic Creek

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mundic Creek (965) sits above Crescent (962). Crescent skews owner-occupied (97%), Mundic Creek runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

Buying in Crescent or Mundic Creek?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Crescent? The free selling guide

Crescent and Mundic Creek side by side

MeasureCrescentMundic Creek
Renting
Owner occupied97.0%59.0%
Renter occupied5.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby64
Average ICSEA962965
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population22130
Median age4758
Climate
Annual rainfall266 mm271 mm
Mean max, January33.3°C33.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mundic Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (965 vs 962). Crescent also has a higher family-household share (80% vs 53%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Crescent vs Mundic Creek: common questions

Does Crescent or Mundic Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mundic Creek scores 965 vs 962 in Crescent. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.