Side by sideSuburb comparison

Crescent vs Renmark South.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Renmark South edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Renmark South (966) sits above Crescent (962). Crescent skews owner-occupied (97%), Renmark South runs more rental-dense (82% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Renmark South edges out on average school ICSEA (966 vs 962).

Common questionsCrescent vs Renmark South

Common questions

Does Crescent or Renmark South have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Renmark South scores 966 vs 962 in Crescent. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Crescent
Metric
Renmark South

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$246/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
97.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
5.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
221
Population
423
47
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
5
962
Avg ICSEA
966

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).