Crescent vs Paringa

Paringa scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Crescent skews owner-occupied (97%), Paringa runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

Buying in Crescent or Paringa?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Crescent? The free selling guide

Crescent and Paringa side by side

MeasureCrescentParinga
Renting
House rent–$410/wk
Unit rent–$200/wk
Owner occupied97.0%78.0%
Renter occupied5.0%20.0%
Schools
Schools nearby66
Average ICSEA962962
Lifestyle and people
Walk score08
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population2211,131
Median age4741
Climate
Annual rainfall266 mm271 mm
Mean max, January33.3°C33.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Crescent has a heavier family-household mix (80% vs 69%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Crescent vs Paringa: common questions

Which is more walkable, Crescent or Paringa?

Paringa scores 8/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.