Epsom vs Blue Mountain

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Blue Mountain (947) sits above Epsom (937).

Buying in Epsom or Blue Mountain?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Epsom? The free selling guide

Epsom and Blue Mountain side by side

MeasureEpsomBlue Mountain
Renting
Owner occupied–81.0%
Renter occupied–27.0%
Schools
Schools nearby919
Average ICSEA937947
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population–83
Median age–44
Climate
Annual rainfall957 mm1229 mm
Mean max, January31.1°C30.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Blue Mountain edges out on average school ICSEA (947 vs 937).

Epsom vs Blue Mountain: common questions

Does Epsom or Blue Mountain have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Blue Mountain scores 947 vs 937 in Epsom. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.