Field vs Colebatch
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Colebatch (1000) sits above Field (942). Colebatch skews owner-occupied (79%), Field runs more rental-dense (68% owner).
Buying in Field or Colebatch?
The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guideSelling in Field? The free selling guide
Field and Colebatch side by side
| Measure | Field | Colebatch |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 68.0% | 79.0% |
| Renter occupied | 32.0% | 42.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 2 | 1 |
| Average ICSEA | 942 | 1000 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | – | 0 |
| Transit score | – | 0 |
| Bike score | – | 0 |
| Population | 83 | 56 |
| Median age | 43 | 56 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm | 475 mm |
| Mean max, January | 28.0°C | 27.9°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Colebatch edges out on average school ICSEA (1000 vs 942).
Field vs Colebatch: common questions
Does Field or Colebatch have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Colebatch scores 1000 vs 942 in Field. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Field with
Choosing between Field and Colebatch?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.