Flying Fish Point vs Coquette Point

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coquette Point (877) sits above Flying Fish Point (866). Coquette Point skews owner-occupied (89%), Flying Fish Point runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

Buying in Flying Fish Point or Coquette Point?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Flying Fish Point? The free selling guide

Flying Fish Point and Coquette Point side by side

MeasureFlying Fish PointCoquette Point
Renting
Owner occupied63.0%89.0%
Renter occupied32.0%7.0%
Schools
Schools nearby810
Average ICSEA866877
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population395117
Median age5059
Climate
Annual rainfall3372 mm3330 mm
Mean max, January31.0°C30.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Coquette Point edges out on average school ICSEA (877 vs 866).

Flying Fish Point vs Coquette Point: common questions

Does Flying Fish Point or Coquette Point have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coquette Point scores 877 vs 866 in Flying Fish Point. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.