Side by sideSuburb comparison

Gordon vs Bonython.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Gordon scores higher on walkability (22/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bonython (1033) sits above Gordon (1032).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bonython edges out on average school ICSEA (1033 vs 1032).

Common questionsGordon vs Bonython

Common questions

Does Gordon or Bonython have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bonython scores 1033 vs 1032 in Gordon. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Gordon or Bonython?

Gordon scores 22/100 on walkability vs 8/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Gordon
Metric
Bonython

Price & Market

Median house
$922,000
Median unit
$715,000
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$410/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$430/wk
$420/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$445/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
71.0%
19.0%
Renter occupied
28.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

22
Walk score
8
100
Transit score
100
100
Bike score
100
7,892
Population
3,839
38
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1032
Avg ICSEA
1033

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).