Horsham vs Horsham.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $379,500 and $379,500. Horsham edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Horsham and Horsham have near-identical medians ($379,500 vs $379,500).
Horsham scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 100/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.
For buyers
The two suburbs land at similar price points ($379,500 vs $379,500), so the buying decision usually comes down to lifestyle fit rather than affordability.
For investors
Horsham offers the higher gross rental yield (5.89% vs 2.74%), favouring cash-flow investors.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.
Common questions
Which is more walkable, Horsham or Horsham?
Horsham scores 100/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Horsham or Horsham?
Gross rental yield on houses is 5.89% in Horsham vs 2.74% in Horsham. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Horsham against another suburb