Side by sideSuburb comparison

Jordan Springs vs Werrington Downs.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Jordan Springs edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Jordan Springs (981) sits above Werrington Downs (976). Werrington Downs skews owner-occupied (82%), Jordan Springs runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Jordan Springs edges out on average school ICSEA (981 vs 976).

Common questionsJordan Springs vs Werrington Downs

Common questions

Does Jordan Springs or Werrington Downs have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Jordan Springs scores 981 vs 976 in Werrington Downs. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Jordan Springs
Metric
Werrington Downs

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$530/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$425/wk
64.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
34.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
4
Transit score
0
Bike score
100
11,772
Population
3,221
30
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
981
Avg ICSEA
976

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).