Marino vs Seacliff Park
Seacliff Park (median $1,262,500) is roughly 16% cheaper to buy into than Marino ($1,500,000). Over the past year, Marino (+1.4%) ran 17.8 percentage points ahead of Seacliff Park (-16.4%) on house-price growth.
Buying in Marino or Seacliff Park?
Selling in Marino? The free selling guide
Marino and Seacliff Park side by side
| Measure | Marino | Seacliff Park |
|---|---|---|
| Price and market | ||
| Median house | $1,500,000 | $1,262,500 |
| Median unit | $293,040 | $293,040 |
| House price change, 12 months | +1.4% | -16.4% |
| Renting | ||
| House rent | $650/wk | $730/wk |
| Unit rent | $400/wk | $475/wk |
| Owner occupied | 88.0% | 77.0% |
| Renter occupied | 11.0% | 21.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 20 | 20 |
| Average ICSEA | 1053 | 1067 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 2 | 24 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 100 | 40 |
| Population | 2,277 | 2,644 |
| Median age | 47 | 41 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 521 mm | 601 mm |
| Mean max, January | 28.1°C | 28.0°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
Seacliff Park scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 24/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Seacliff Park (1067) sits above Marino (1053). Marino skews owner-occupied (88%), Seacliff Park runs more rental-dense (77% owner).
- For buyers
- Seacliff Park is the lower entry point at $1,262,500 median, 16% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
- For investors
- Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Seacliff Park delivers the better gross yield (3.01% vs 2.25%), but Marino has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.
- For families
- Seacliff Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1067 vs 1053). Marino also has a higher family-household share (80% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Marino vs Seacliff Park: common questions
Is Marino or Seacliff Park cheaper to buy in?
Seacliff Park has the lower median house price at $1,262,500, roughly 16% below Marino ($1,500,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Which has stronger property growth, Marino or Seacliff Park?
Over the past 12 months, Marino grew +1.4% vs -16.4% in Seacliff Park, a gap of 17.8 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.
Does Marino or Seacliff Park have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Seacliff Park scores 1067 vs 1053 in Marino. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Marino or Seacliff Park?
Seacliff Park scores 24/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Marino or Seacliff Park?
Gross rental yield on houses is 3.01% in Seacliff Park vs 2.25% in Marino. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Marino with
Choosing between Marino and Seacliff Park?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.