Mount Larcom vs Aldoga

Mount Larcom scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Aldoga (943) sits above Mount Larcom (909).

Buying in Mount Larcom or Aldoga?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mount Larcom? The free selling guide

Mount Larcom and Aldoga side by side

MeasureMount LarcomAldoga
Renting
Owner occupied81.0%–
Renter occupied19.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby22
Average ICSEA909943
Lifestyle and people
Walk score40
Transit score100
Bike score00
Population332–
Median age42–
Climate
Annual rainfall850 mm833 mm
Mean max, January31.1°C31.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Aldoga edges out on average school ICSEA (943 vs 909).

Mount Larcom vs Aldoga: common questions

Does Mount Larcom or Aldoga have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Aldoga scores 943 vs 909 in Mount Larcom. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Mount Larcom or Aldoga?

Mount Larcom scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.